Pamela Anderson Should've Been The Mortal Woman On Stage In Interview With The Vampire


I was recalling the classic Anne Rice film Interview with the Vampire -- I really didn't pay too much attention to its detail. There was the classic show-stealing scene that stole my innocence in the 1990s. It was the Theatre Des Vampires scene with Laure Marsac.

As it was said, this would be the category for the victim to why Marsac was chosen...

Vampires, especially the stylish sub-breed of those defiling bloodsuckers who group together onscreen in movies Oscar-nominated for art direction, are very choosy about the virginally sweet child-women they ceremoniously disrobe, slay, and slurp upon. The ideal sacrifice must be fair of skin, fine-boned of face, with a blondeness reminiscent of a stilled breeze, a wiry wisp of which blondeness must cover the juncture at the top of her thighs. When she stands, a drugged satiation must cause her eyes to droop as if in satisfied lust, and her breasts must be plump and buoyant, as if filled and bobbing with life's most important fluid. In short, the perfect victim and party favor is embodied by French actress Laure Marsac, as full-frontally revealed in Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles (1994).

Laure is pretty but not "such beauty". It would be interesting that she starred in Vampire in Paradise in 1992 before becoming an extra part in 1994. Laure has had a part as Nathalie Belford in the said film where it was a vampire comedy. Though, she probably never expected she would be cast as a human sacrifice in 1994. The part was too small for such a big actress. 

I thought that one actress could've covered that extra part in the Theatre Des Vampires through and through as an extra part...


Granted, the film was in 1994 so Pamela Anderson just didn't have her unnecessary disfigurements. I think the directors weren't very choosy. Pamela has those features such as being fin-boned of face, her blonde dye job has the reminiscence of a stilled breeze, and she has a very innocent-looking face. Pamela's beauty would make anyone call her a beauty by my side. She fits the description more than Laure! So why didn't the directors get her?! Baffling!

If you think of it... Pamela does pass the following standards of the directors for the victim on stage:
  • Fair-skinned - CHECK!
  • Fine-boned face - CHECK!
  • Blondeness like a stilled breeze - CHECK!
  • Wiry wisp - CHECK!
  • Drugged satiation must cause her eyes to droop - CHECK! 
  • Breasts must be plump and buoyant - CHECK!

I'd want to assume that the directors themselves never saw Snapdragon or The Best of Pamela Anderson. Seeing those two videos would give them what they wanted. Snapdragon had scenes of her really had the look directors were looking for. The very nude scenes would show the kind of sight that vampires would want to have already told directors what they were looking for. 

Comments