TV Ratings vs. Quality

Thinking about some useful insights by the Fantasy Leader on TV ratings, I would like to discuss on the differences with this example...


My favorite example would be on Power Rangers and Super Sentai.  So I guess it's already common knowledge now Super Sentai came first, true Power Rangers fans shouldn't be close minded about Super Sentai.  The truth is more people have seen Power Rangers than Super Sentai but that doesn't make Power Rangers better.


So maybe I'll use the examples of Samurai Sentai Shinkenger and its adaptation Power Rangers Samurai.  So pretty much, there are more people who've seen Power Rangers than Super Sentai due to accessibility worldwide.  People tend to think if it's American it's good but I don't really throw my hate on Power Rangers, I still like the franchise but not as much as much.  On the other hand, despite Super Sentai's being underrated I still like it for better quality than Power Rangers.  I just thought Power Rangers Samurai is really  a horrid season, Tzachor does a bad job yet it still gets popular?  On the other hand Shinkenger has a better way of doing things than Power Rangers Samurai yet due to Super Sentai being underrated, it has a lower rating for a show of better quality.

Overall, people must judge quality based on standards, subjective vs. objective and not on TV ratings.  Sometimes the most popular shows are pretty lame if you ask me like Lion Voltron.

Comments